Skip to content
BREAM/SIGNALS
INSIGHT BANK/Frontier Science

Frozen card revision. This is the recorded reading, not an automatically refreshed view. Current card ↗

Frontier Science · TOPIC v1

Can measuring brain function help us choose an antidepressant?

Which differences in treatment response do measured differences between patients represent?

Read article → Can measuring brain function help us choose an antidepressant?

2026-09-23 09:08:41.974 UTC · Last recorded update

CURRENT READING

In SMART-D’s main analysis of 47 participants over eight weeks, selecting a marker-consistent drug did not demonstrate better outcomes.

Recorded editorial state, not a maturity score

  1. Historical dataRecorded
  2. Prospective trialRecorded
  3. Selection utilityUnverified
  4. ReplicationUnverified
New question opened · v1

Published the analysis and recorded the next checks.

Permanent link to this revision ↗
01 / WHAT WE TRACK

Which differences in treatment response do measured differences between patients represent?

02 / EVIDENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Resting-state fMRI / cognitive tasks / clinical prediction

03 / EDITORIAL READING

Which differences in treatment response do measured differences between patients represent?

04 / WHAT REMAINS UNKNOWN

The result concerns the utility of these models for treatment selection, not the impossibility of fMRI-based or personalized care.

05 / NEXT CHECK

Drug comparisons at the same treatment stage, and separate validation of early changes to inform subsequent decisions.

A hypothesis to keep honest

HYPOTHESIS · NOT YET TESTED

Functional changes after treatment starts may help reach decisions sooner when pretreatment prediction alone is insufficient.

What would change our view: Reconsider if prospective comparisons in other populations do not reproduce improved decisions or patient benefit.

A prospective test proposal, not a prediction score. A graph connection does not validate this hypothesis.

Linked people & organizations

Open an entity to find its cards

Related questions, optional follows

Map ↗

Latest card updates

Latest 5 · editorial record dates
  1. v1 · 2026-09-23 09:08:41.974 UTCNew question opened

    Published the analysis and recorded the next checks.

    Reading at the time: In SMART-D’s main analysis of 47 participants over eight weeks, selecting a marker-consistent drug did not demonstrate better outcomes.

Earlier updates (0)

Earlier entries will appear here once more than five reader-facing revisions have accumulated.

Background readings

Source dates and verification scope

原著論文 ↗
www.nature.com · accessed 2026-09-23 · public-source

セルトラリンの処方情報 ↗
dailymed.nlm.nih.gov · accessed 2026-09-23 · public-source

ブプロピオンの処方情報 ↗
dailymed.nlm.nih.gov · accessed 2026-09-23 · public-source

トランスポーターの機能調節を調べた研究 ↗
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · accessed 2026-09-23 · public-source

先行研究 ↗
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · accessed 2026-09-23 · public-source

fMRI信号と神経活動を比較した基礎研究 ↗
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · accessed 2026-09-23 · public-source

Optional readership measurement

Allow this site to record page views, reading progress, a broad referral source and the ID of a prepared editorial post link? Reading and following cards work without this. Hosting-provider traffic logs are separate. Details & settings